The Multiplier Effect: AI, Personality, & Culture

Part 5 of 14 in our series on generative AI and organizational dynamics

March 06, 2024

Design an image that more explicitly represents the integration of Artificial Intelligence (AI) with the elements of personality and organizational culture, emphasizing the unique contributions of diverse personalities and cultural backgrounds to a collaborative team environment. The visual should illustrate AI's role in analyzing and adapting to individual differences, promoting a positive and inclusive culture, and customizing interactions to enhance team dynamics. Include symbolic representations of different personality traits and cultural symbols, alongside AI elements like algorithms and data analytics, to show how this blend leads to a rich, dynamic, and innovative team setting.

There’s a good reason that much of the curriculum in business school education is based on empirical findings from the social sciences. If an organization wants to perform at an optimal level it must unlock and harness the full potential of each of its members, as well as understand its external clients, and the human aspects of its competitive landscapes. At the highest level, this means understanding as much as we can about ourselves and others in a variety of situations. More specifically, courses in strategy, marketing, organizational behavior, economics, etc. examine, in essence, the laws of human nature from nuanced perspectives and with slightly different aims - but they all share the same general goal —understanding the human condition in ways that add maximum value.

Two critically important components associated with this level of understanding include a deep knowledge of human personality, and how our personalities both shape and are formed by culture, including organizational and national culture. Of course, there are countless empirically supported frameworks and models for understanding both of these dimensions. This white paper will provide a brief overview of some of the prevailing theories and foundational paradigms associated with each. However, the overarching aim is to examine ways that artificial intelligence (AI) is both propelling and changing our approach to, and understanding of personality and culture, and to consider how these new capabilities might be applied vis-a-vis organizational and societal dynamics.

Generative AI is revolutionizing empirical research across various fields, including social sciences, natural sciences, and even humanities, by offering innovative tools and methodologies for data generation, analysis, and interpretation. Here’s an overview of the significant ways in which generative AI is transforming this process:

Enhanced Data Generation and Simulation

Generative AI models, such as Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), can produce highly realistic, synthetic datasets that mimic real-world data. This capability is invaluable in fields where data collection is challenging, expensive, or ethically sensitive. Researchers can simulate complex data sets, including human behavioral patterns or genetic sequences, to explore hypotheses or train other AI models without privacy concerns or logistical constraints.

Boosting Creativity and Innovation

By generating novel data interpretations and hypotheses, generative AI fuels creativity in research. AI can uncover patterns and correlations that might not be immediately apparent to human researchers, prompting new lines of inquiry. For instance, in drug discovery, AI algorithms can predict how different chemical compounds might interact, speeding up the development of new medications.

Improving Research Efficiency

Generative AI can automate parts of the research process that traditionally require significant human labor, such as literature reviews, data preprocessing, and even some aspects of experimental design. This automation allows researchers to focus on more complex and creative aspects of their work, potentially accelerating the pace of discovery.

Enhancing Replicability and Robustness

AI-generated data and AI-driven analyses can improve the replicability of scientific findings. By using synthetic data or AI-generated models, researchers can repeatedly test hypotheses under controlled conditions that closely mimic real-world variability. This practice can help address the replication crisis by providing a more stable foundation for verifying scientific claims.

Expanding Methodological Possibilities

Generative AI introduces new methodological approaches, such as the ability to model counterfactuals or conduct "what if" analyses that would be impossible or impractical in real-world conditions. These capabilities allow researchers to explore causal relationships and hypothetical scenarios in a controlled, simulated environment.

Ethical and Epistemological Implications

As generative AI shapes empirical research, it also raises ethical and epistemological questions. The use of synthetic data, for instance, necessitates careful consideration of issues like consent, privacy, and the potential for AI-generated biases. Moreover, the interpretability of AI-driven findings and the trustworthiness of AI-generated data are critical areas of ongoing debate.

Conclusion

Generative AI is not just a tool for enhancing traditional research methodologies; it is a paradigm shift that expands the boundaries of what is possible in empirical research. While it offers immense potential for innovation, efficiency, and discovery, it also challenges researchers to navigate new ethical, methodological, and conceptual landscapes. As generative AI continues to evolve, its impact on empirical research will likely deepen, necessitating ongoing dialogue among scientists, ethicists, and policymakers to harness its benefits while mitigating its risks (Personal conversation with OpenAI’s ChatGPT, March 1, 2024).

An Overview of Traditional Theories of Personality

Traditional theories of personality have long sought to explain the patterns in thoughts, feelings, and behaviors that distinguish one person from another. These theories provide a foundation for understanding the complexity of human nature and guide various applications, from psychological assessment to therapeutic interventions. Here's an overview of the prevailing theories, models, and foundations in traditional personality psychology:

Psychoanalytic Theory

Founder: Sigmund FreudSummary: Freud's psychoanalytic theory posits that personality is shaped by unconscious forces and childhood experiences. Central to this theory are the concepts of the id, ego, and superego, which represent different aspects of personality that influence behavior through internal conflict. Freud also emphasized the role of psychosexual stages in personality development (Freud, 1923; Myers & DeWall, 2018).

Psychodynamic Theories

Proponents: Carl Jung, Alfred Adler, Erik EriksonSummary: Building on Freud's ideas, psychodynamic theories introduce new dimensions to the understanding of personality. Jung introduced the concepts of the collective unconscious and archetypes. Adler focused on feelings of inferiority and the striving for superiority. Erikson emphasized psychosocial development across the lifespan, outlining eight stages of personality development (McAdams, 1997).

Trait Theories

Proponents: Gordon Allport, Raymond Cattell, Hans Eysenck, the Five-Factor Model (Costa & McCrae, 1992)Summary: Trait theories propose that personality is composed of broad, stable traits that influence behavior. Allport identified three types of traits: cardinal, central, and secondary. Cattell proposed 16 personality factors, while Eysenck focused on three major dimensions: extraversion, neuroticism, and psychoticism. The Five-Factor Model (or Big Five) identifies five broad traits: openness, conscientiousness, extraversion, agreeableness, and neuroticism (Weiten, 2017; Myers & DeWall, 2018).

Behaviorist Theories

Proponents: B.F. Skinner, John B. WatsonSummary: Behaviorist theories argue that personality is a result of learned behavior patterns based on interactions with the environment. Skinner, in particular, emphasized the role of reinforcement and punishment in shaping behavior and personality (Lahey, 2012).

Social Cognitive Theories

Proponents: Albert BanduraSummary: Social cognitive theories focus on the interaction between individual factors, behavior, and the environment. Bandura introduced the concept of reciprocal determinism and emphasized the role of self-efficacy in personality development. Observational learning (or modeling) is also a key mechanism in acquiring and changing behaviors and attitudes (Santrock, 2019).

Humanistic Theories

Proponents: Abraham Maslow, Carl RogersSummary: Humanistic theories emphasize individual growth, self-actualization, and the intrinsic goodness of people. Maslow proposed a hierarchy of needs culminating in self-actualization. Rogers focused on the self-concept and conditional vs. unconditional positive regard in shaping personality. Humanistic psychology stresses the importance of free will and personal choice in personality development (Myers & DeWall, 2018).

Existential and Phenomenological Theories

Proponents: Rollo May, Viktor FranklSummary: These theories delve into the existential aspects of human life, such as meaning, choice, and death. They focus on the individual's experience and the pursuit of authenticity and personal meaning in life. Frankl's logotherapy emphasizes finding life's meaning as the central human motivational force (Feist, Feist, & Roberts, 2020).

Each of these traditional theories of personality offers unique insights into the complexities of human nature, contributing to a comprehensive understanding of personality. They have each informed research, assessment, and therapeutic practices in distinct ways, highlighting the multifaceted nature of personality psychology.

NOTE: Our book, The Multiplier Effect: AI and Organizational Dynamics, which is targeted for release later this year, explores each of the themes introduced in our 14-part article series in significantly greater depth. Please look for its release later this year.

An Overview of Traditional Theories of Culture

Organizational and national cultures, along with personality, form foundations of behavior and interaction within and across groups. These elements collectively influence decision-making, teamwork, and leadership styles, underscoring the complex interplay between individual characteristics and shared values. Theories in psychology and sociology explore this intersection, revealing how personality traits shape and are shaped by the cultural contexts in which individuals operate. This relationship highlights the importance of cultural and personal awareness in achieving effective communication and collaboration in increasingly globalized and diverse environments. Below is a brief overview of the prevailing theories with respect to organizational and national culture.

Organizational culture

Theoretical models of organizational culture are frameworks that help to describe, understand, and analyze the culture within organizations. They offer a lens through which one can view the complex social dynamics that influence how an organization functions. Below are some brief summaries of the key theoretical models:

Edgar Schein's Model of Organizational Culture: Schein's model is one of the most influential frameworks for analyzing organizational culture. He describes culture as consisting of three levels:

  • Artifacts: These are the visible structures, processes, and behaviors within an organization that are easy to observe but difficult to decipher.

  • Espoused Values: These are the stated strategies, goals, philosophies, and justifications that people in the organization express.

  • Basic Underlying Assumptions: These are the unconscious, taken-for-granted beliefs, perceptions, and feelings that truly define the essence of the culture (Schein, 2010).

Deal and Kennedy's Cultural Framework: Deal and Kennedy identified four types of organizational culture based on how quickly feedback is received on decisions and actions and the level of risk involved:

  • The Tough-Guy, Macho Culture: Characterized by individual risk-taking and rapid feedback. It's a world of high stakes, where quick decisions lead to quick rewards or failures. Common in sales-oriented or high-risk professions.

  • The Work-Hard/Play-Hard Culture: Focuses on high energy and rapid feedback from actions, but with lower risk. Success comes from persistence and teamwork. Common in large sales teams or goal-driven companies with a focus on customer service.

  • The Bet-Your-Company Culture: Decisions have high stakes with slow feedback loops. These cultures are found in industries where investment in projects takes years to yield results, such as pharmaceuticals or aerospace.

  • The Process Culture: Emphasizes slow feedback and low risk, leading to a focus on details and process over outcomes. Often found in bureaucracies, where adherence to rules and regulations is valued over immediate results (Deal & Kennedy, 1982).

Denison's Organizational Culture Model: Denison's model links organizational culture to organizational performance and identifies four key traits of culture:

  • Involvement: Building human capability, ownership, and responsibility.

  • Consistency: The values and systems that contribute to a sense of reliability and predictability.

  • Adaptability: Organizational learning and the ability to change.

  • Mission: Defining a meaningful long-term direction for the organization (Denison, 1990).

O'Reilly, Chatman & Caldwell’s Organizational Culture Profile (OCP): This model identifies seven dimensions that can define an organization’s culture:

  • Innovation: Encourages creativity, experimentation, and the generation of new ideas and solutions. Organizations with a strong innovation culture are often flexible and quick to adapt to changes.

  • Stability: Values consistency, predictability, and efficiency in operations. Such cultures prioritize reliable performance and smooth functioning over rapid growth or change.

  • Respect for People: Focuses on valuing individuals and their contributions, fostering a supportive and inclusive environment. This dimension emphasizes the importance of trust, integrity, and personal relationships.

  • Outcome Orientation: Prioritizes results and achievement of goals. Cultures with a strong outcome orientation are often competitive, with a focus on meeting targets and benchmarks.

  • Detail Orientation: Emphasizes precision, analysis, and attention to detail in work processes. Such cultures value thoroughness and accuracy, often in industries where mistakes can have significant consequences.

  • Team Orientation: Highlights collaboration and teamwork. Organizations with a strong team orientation believe that collective efforts lead to better results, fostering a sense of community and shared responsibility.

  • Aggressiveness: Characterized by competitiveness and a strong desire to be the best. Aggressive cultures are dynamic and bold, often pushing boundaries to achieve leadership in their fields (O'Reilly, Chatman, & Caldwell, 1991).

Hofstede's Organizational Cultures: While Hofstede's work is primarily on national cultures (discussed in the section below), he also applied his dimensions to organizational settings. In particular, he discusses how practices differ from values and can be influenced by a company's procedures and systems (Hofstede, Hofstede, & Minkov, 2010).

The Competing Values Framework (CVF): Developed by Robert Quinn and John Rohrbaugh, the CVF assesses organizational culture based on two dimensions: flexibility versus stability and internal focus versus external focus. The combination of these dimensions leads to four types of organizational culture:

  • Clan Culture: Characterized by a family-like atmosphere where mentoring, nurturing, and participation are emphasized. It focuses on internal maintenance with flexibility, concern for people, and sensitivity for customers. Clan cultures value loyalty, tradition, and teamwork, aiming to create a cohesive work environment.

  • Adhocracy Culture: Emphasizes innovation, creativity, and adaptability. Organizations with an adhocracy culture are dynamic and entrepreneurial, often taking risks and experimenting with new ideas. They focus on external positioning and value individual initiative and freedom.

  • Market Culture: Focused on competitiveness and goal achievement. Market cultures are results-oriented, emphasizing productivity, efficiency, and achieving targets. They prioritize external interactions and transactions with a strong orientation towards customers and markets.

  • Hierarchy Culture: Values stability, order, and control. Organizations with a hierarchy culture operate through structured procedures and well-defined processes. They focus on internal maintenance with a need for efficiency, consistency, and uniformity, aiming for reliable and smooth operations.Each of these models provides a different perspective on organizational culture and its impact on employees, organizational effectiveness, and performance. They serve as tools for leaders and managers to understand and shape the cultures of their organizations (Quinn & Rohrbaugh, 1983)

National culture

Theories of national culture aim to explain the systemic differences between cultures and societies. These theories are essential for understanding how values, beliefs, and practices can influence behaviors within countries. Some of the main theories include:

Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions Theory: Geert Hofstede, a Dutch social psychologist, proposed this theory based on a large-scale survey at IBM. He originally identified four dimensions of culture (later expanded to six) that could distinguish one culture from another: Power Distance Index (PDI), Individualism vs. Collectivism (IDV), Masculinity vs. Femininity (MAS), Uncertainty Avoidance Index (UAI), Long-Term Orientation vs. Short-Term Normative Orientation (LTO), and Indulgence vs. Restraint (IVR) (Hofstede, Hofstede, & Minkov, 2010).

Trompenaars' Seven Dimensions of Culture: Fons Trompenaars, a Dutch organizational theorist, identified seven cultural dimensions: Universalism vs. Particularism, Individualism vs. Communitarianism, Specific vs. Diffuse, Neutral vs. Emotional, Achievement vs. Ascription, Sequential Time vs. Synchronous Time, and Internal vs. External Control (Trompenaars & Hampden-Turner, 1997).

Hall's Cultural Factors: Edward T. Hall, an American anthropologist, introduced the concept of high-context and low-context cultures. This theory emphasizes the importance of underlying context in communication as opposed to explicit verbal information. Hall also discussed concepts such as monochronic and polychronic time perceptions (Hall, 1976).

Schwartz's Cultural Value Orientations: Shalom Schwartz, a social psychologist, proposed a theory that identifies ten basic personal values recognized across cultures which can be further grouped into four higher-order values: Conservation, Openness to Change, Self-Enhancement, and Self-Transcendence (Schwartz, 1992).

GLOBE Project's Cultural Dimensions: The Global Leadership and Organizational Behavior Effectiveness (GLOBE) Study extended Hofstede's model and defined nine cultural dimensions: Power Distance, Uncertainty Avoidance, Collectivism I (societal collectivism), Collectivism II (in-group collectivism), Gender Egalitarianism, Assertiveness, Future Orientation, Performance Orientation, and Humane Orientation (House, Hanges, Javidan, Dorfman, Gupta, 2004).

Inglehart's Cultural Map of the World: Ronald Inglehart, a political scientist, developed the World Values Survey which led to the cultural map of the world. The map is based on two dimensions: Traditional values versus Secular-rational values and Survival values versus Self-expression values (Inglehart, Welzel, 2005).

These theories are not without their critics, as cultural dynamics are complex and ever-evolving. Furthermore, these theories often draw from a cross-section of data that may not account for subcultures within nations or changes over time. However, they provide frameworks for cross-cultural comparison and have been influential in the fields of international business, communication, and management.

Create an image that symbolizes the convergence of personality theory and culture theory, influenced and advanced by artificial intelligence. The visual should represent a fusion of human traits and cultural symbols, intertwined with digital or AI elements, to depict the modern exploration of these theories through technology. Include symbols or abstract representations of different cultures around a central figure that embodies the essence of human personality, all interconnected with digital, AI-inspired motifs.

How AI is Advancing & Changing our Understanding of Personality and Culture

In the evolving landscape of organizational development, the integration of artificial intelligence with human factors such as personality and culture is creating a multiplier effect, significantly enhancing team performance, innovation, and adaptability. Here, we explore how AI, when aligned with the nuanced dimensions of personality and organizational culture, can amplify human potential, foster a more cohesive work environment, and drive unprecedented growth and efficiency.

The Role of AI in Understanding Personality

AI-driven analytics and machine learning models are revolutionizing the way we understand and manage human personality within teams. By analyzing vast amounts of data, these technologies can uncover intricate patterns and nuances in individual behaviors, preferences, and strengths. This allows for a highly personalized approach to management, where strategies can be tailored to align with the unique characteristics of each team member.

Such personalized management strategies foster a more inclusive and efficient workplace environment. They enable leaders to assign tasks that best fit an individual's natural inclinations and skills, enhancing job satisfaction and productivity. Moreover, understanding the diversity of personalities within a team through AI can help in optimizing team dynamics, encouraging a more collaborative and harmonious work culture. This data-driven insight into human personality is a leap forward in creating more adaptive, responsive, and effective management practices. Here’s a brief look at some of the ways AI is creating a multiplier effect in this regard:

  • Personalized Workflows: By analyzing personality traits, AI can recommend personalized workflows and task assignments that align with individual strengths, thereby increasing engagement and productivity.

  • Enhanced Communication: AI's understanding of personality dynamics facilitates more effective communication strategies, tailoring interactions to suit different personality types and mitigating potential conflicts.

  • Predictive Performance Analysis: AI systems can predict how different personalities might perform under various conditions, enabling organizations to prepare more effectively for future projects and teams. This predictive insight helps in strategically assembling teams that are more likely to succeed, based on the complementary nature of members' personalities.

  • Dynamic Learning and Development: AI-driven platforms can tailor learning and development programs to individual personality traits, optimizing the learning process. By providing personalized learning experiences, employees are more likely to engage with training materials and apply new knowledge in their roles, fostering continuous personal and professional growth.

Amplifying Organizational Culture with AI

AI can both reflect and shape organizational culture, using data to reinforce cultural values and promote behaviors that align with organizational goals.

  • Culture Analytics: AI tools analyze communication patterns, feedback, and engagement metrics to gauge the health of organizational culture, identifying areas of alignment and divergence.

  • Promoting Cultural Fit: During recruitment and onboarding, AI can assess the cultural fit of potential hires, ensuring new team members complement and enhance the existing organizational culture.

  • Culture Customization and Evolution: AI can help organizations tailor their culture over time, responding to internal changes and external market pressures. By analyzing trends and employee feedback, AI can suggest adjustments to policies, practices, and communications that better align with the evolving cultural identity and goals.

  • Behavioral Modification and Incentivization: While somewhat controversial (at least from FuturePoint Digital’s perspective, due to the slippery slope it implies) by monitoring and analyzing employee behavior, AI can identify patterns that either support or detract from desired cultural norms. This insight enables the development of targeted incentive programs and interventions aimed at promoting behaviors that reinforce the organizational culture, fostering a cohesive and motivated workforce (Personal conversation with OpenAI’s ChatGPT, March 1, 2024).  

Create an image that represents the dynamic and innovative environment of a tech startup, highlighting the integration of AI into team management and product development. Show a diverse team working together on various projects, with elements symbolizing AI, creativity, and rapid product development, such as computers displaying code, brainstorming sessions, and dynamic communication flows. The setting should be modern and vibrant, reflecting a culture of agility and innovation.

The Multiplier Effect in Action: Amplifying Team Performance Through AI Insights

In the dynamic world of tech startups, the agility to innovate and adapt to market demands is crucial for survival and growth. The integration of AI into the strategic management of team dynamics and organizational culture represents a paradigm shift in how these entities conceptualize and execute innovation. AI's ability to analyze and interpret complex data on team personality compositions and cultural alignment has become a cornerstone for developing highly adaptive and creative teams. This case study delves into how such AI-driven insights have catalyzed a transformation within tech startups, leading to unprecedented efficiencies in product development cycles and heightened market responsiveness.

Context and Challenges:

Tech startups operate in a highly competitive environment where the speed of innovation can determine market leadership. Traditional methods of team formation and project management often fall short in the face of rapidly evolving technology landscapes and consumer expectations. Startups faced challenges in:

AI-Driven Transformation:

Leveraging AI for deep insights into team personality dynamics and cultural alignment has enabled startups to strategically compose teams that are not only technically proficient but also culturally cohesive and adaptable. Key outcomes include:

Concrete Example:

A notable instance involves a startup focused on developing AI-based healthcare solutions. By applying AI insights into team compositions, the company strategically assembled a cross-functional team whose members' personalities and skills perfectly complemented each other. The team's balanced mix of innovators, executors, and communicators, underpinned by a culture supportive of rapid experimentation and learning, led to the development of a groundbreaking AI diagnostic tool in record time. The product not only exceeded initial market expectations but also set new standards for innovation in the healthcare sector.

Conclusion:

The case of tech startups harnessing AI to enhance team dynamics and cultural alignment exemplifies the multiplier effect in action. By leveraging AI-driven insights, startups can transcend traditional barriers to innovation, fostering environments where creativity flourishes, and product development cycles are markedly optimized. This strategic integration of technology and human insight heralds a new era of organizational efficiency and market adaptability (Personal conversation with OpenAI’s ChatGPT, March 1, 2024).  

Ethical Considerations and Future Outlook

As organizations navigate the integration of AI with human factors, ethical considerations, including privacy, consent, and bias mitigation, remain paramount. The future will likely see a continued evolution of AI capabilities, further enhancing our understanding and leveraging of personality and culture within organizational contexts. We will expand on this further in our upcoming article entitled, The Multiplier Effect: AI, Ethics, Regulatory, & Legal Considerations.

Conclusion

The multiplier effect of combining AI with personality and culture represents a frontier in organizational development, offering profound and broad opportunities for enhancing team performance and achieving strategic objectives. Organizations that successfully navigate this integration will not only realize significant operational efficiencies but also foster a work environment that is more aligned, engaged, and capable of driving innovation.

How might Future Point Digital help your organization reimagine the art of the possible with respect to new ways of working, doing, thinking, and communicating via emerging technology? Follow us at: www.futurepointdigital.com

About the Author: David Ragland is a former senior technology executive and an adjunct professor of management. He serves as a partner at FuturePoint Digital, a research-based technology consultancy specializing in strategy, advisory, and educational services for global clients. David earned his Doctorate in Business Administration from IE University in Madrid, Spain, and a Master of Science in Information and Telecommunications Systems from Johns Hopkins University. He also holds an undergraduate degree in Psychology from James Madison University and completed a certificate in Artificial Intelligence and Business Strategy at MIT. His research focuses on the intersection of emerging technology with organizational and societal dynamics.

References

Costa, P. T., Jr., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Deal, T. E., & Kennedy, A. A. (1982). Corporate cultures: The rites and rituals of corporate life. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Denison, D. R. (1990). Corporate culture and organizational effectiveness. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.

Feist, J., Feist, G. J., & Roberts, T.-A. (2020). Theories of Personality (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. SE, 19, 1-66.

Hall, E. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, NY: Anchor Press.

Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind. Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (Eds.). (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations: The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Sage publications.

Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy: The Human Development Sequence. Cambridge University Press.

Lahey, B. B. (2012). Psychology: An Introduction (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill.

McAdams, D. P. (1997). A conceptual history of personality psychology. In R. Hogan, J. Johnson, & S. Briggs (Eds.), Handbook of Personality Psychology (pp. 3-39). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Myers, D. G., & DeWall, C. N. (2018). Psychology in Modules (11th ed.). Worth Publishers.

O'Reilly, C. A., Chatman, J., & Caldwell, D. F. (1991). People and organizational culture: A profile comparison approach to assessing person-organization fit. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 487-516.

Quinn, R. E., & Rohrbaugh, J. (1983). A spatial model of effectiveness criteria: Towards a competing values approach to organizational analysis. Management Science, 29(3), 363-377. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.29.3.363

Santrock, J. W. (2019). Psychology (16th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education.

Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational Culture and Leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60281-6

Trompenaars, F., & Hampden-Turner, C. (1997). Riding the waves of culture: Understanding diversity in global business (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.

Weiten, W. (2017). Psychology: Themes and Variations (10th ed.). Cengage Learning.